Virtual Town Hall Q&A Link to this section
ink to this section
These are the questions and answers presented during the Virtual District Stabilization Town Hall on March 13, 2025. The questions were taken from the survey sent out to SFUSD families, staff, and community members before the virtual town hall. We received 244 responses before the town hall, and we selected questions based on the following criteria:
- Most frequently asked
- Representation across school sites and grade levels
- Questions from staff and family members
Questions and answers have been slightly edited for clarity. You can also view the recorded town hall Q&A session (Q&A starts at 21:00).
Questions & Answers Video Clips from the Virtual Town Hall on 3/13/2025 Link to this section
YouTube Playlist Questions & Answers from the Virtual SFUSD Budget & Stabilization Town Hall - 03/13/2025 | Watch Now |
How does the district plan to support newcomer immigrant children and LGBTQ populations? | Watch Now |
Where do SFUSD funds come from? | Watch Now |
How will budget cuts impact school nurse positions? | Watch Now |
Explaining SFUSD's expenditures, revenue and fund balance | Watch Now |
How did we get in this financial situation? | Watch Now |
How will educator staffing cuts impact student/teacher ratios, and overall, how will this impact the quality of education? | Watch Now |
Why is the district using a hiring freeze to prevent Parent-Teacher Organizations from paying for intervention specialists and class reduction teachers? | Watch Now |
Why is the district reducing the number of assistant principal positions? | Watch Now |
After completing $113M in cuts, what will be the source of income for SFUSD so we can be stable and grow as needed? | Watch Now |
What is the research and evidence that changing the Spanish Immersion program to 50-50 model is effective? | Watch Now |
What is the research and evidence that changing the Spanish Immersion program to a 50-50 model is effective? | Watch Now |
Which student programs (e.g. arts, music, sports, special education, counseling) are at risk of being reduced or eliminated? | Watch Now |
How will Individual Education Plans be affected by budget cuts? | Watch Now |
Site Discretionary Funds
Link to this section
26% of questions submitted
Why is the district using a hiring freeze to prevent Parent-Teacher Organizations/Associations (PTOs/PTAs) from paying for intervention specialists and class size reduction teachers? These positions and roles already exist in schools.
This question is from a parent at Argonne Elementary School.
SFUSD’s supplemental hiring guidelines for schools is meant to provide clarity on how schools can use site discretionary funds such as PTO/PTA funds to pay for additional staff outside of the number of staff allocated to each school by the district. The main purposes of the guide are to ensure that the district maintains its ability to make decisions about its own budget, operations, and programs (position control in the district) and to ensure that we have a qualified teacher in every classroom.
There are many positions that schools can pay for that are listed in the guide, such as instructional aids, family liaisons, elementary and student advisors, school clerks, community school coordinators, and assistant principals at elementary, middle, and high schools.
However, because we are in the middle of a national teacher shortage, we are asking everyone to support us by holding off on hiring certificated teachers until SFUSD has the chance to staff all our classrooms. We currently still have 98 classrooms that do not have a teacher in them, and we cannot meet our goals unless our classrooms have teachers.
Why is SFUSD putting restrictions on outside funding (e.g. PTO/PTA funds) at a time when the district has a major deficit?
This question is from a parent at Starr King Elementary School.
We developed the supplemental hiring guidelines to provide clarity on how schools can use their site discretionary funds, including PTO/PTA funds, to pay for additional staff. This includes family liaisons, community school coordinators, student advisors, counselors, social workers, and assistant principals. We are balancing strategically leveraging outside funding while also ensuring that we have a qualified teacher in every classroom across all of our schools.
Our school is a Title 1 school. We were told by the principal that we couldn't pay for our reading interventionist with our Title 1 funds. Shouldn't each site determine how to spend the money?
My child has really benefited from the reading teacher and so have many other students. If we as a district are trying to prioritize reading, why are we not continuing this extremely important role?
This question is from a parent at Lawton Alternative School.
Like many districts, we are impacted by a nationwide teacher shortage. Our priority is to have a highly qualified teacher in every classroom across the district. We have created the supplemental hiring guidelines to ensure school sites do have discretion on how to spend their money. To focus on the options that are allowed, schools can use their discretionary dollars for instructional assistants, student advisors, family liaisons, school clerks, counselors, social workers, nurses, or assistant principals.
In this case, Lawton may want to consider an A-series paraeducator position which supports instruction in core academic subjects.
It seems shortsighted to restrict the use of PTA funds to subsidize staff. Some parents will likely leave the district for charter or private schools if PTAs cannot continue to fund prior staff levels. Why make this change when PTAs are funding it?
This question is from a parent at McKinley Elementary School.
We certainly hope that families do not leave SFUSD, especially as we have been seeing enrollment going up and hope to continue that trend. We know that parents care deeply about their child’s education, as do we. We are very grateful for PTA/PTO/PTSA’s hard work and contributions at your child’s school.
The supplemental hiring guidelines allow schools to pay for many different categories of additional staff. We acknowledge that for some families, these guidelines feel restrictive. The bigger goal is for SFUSD to hire the qualified teachers desperately needed in every classroom. When we have teachers in every classroom, we will be able to lift all boats together. This is the only way for us to achieve our goals for academic excellence. In the end, we are a united and unified school district, and we have to come together as a community as a whole.
Hiring Freeze and Layoffs
Link to this section
18% of questions submitted
We've heard about significant staffing cuts within SFUSD. How will this impact student/teacher ratios, and overall, how will this impact the quality of education, facilities, and support to students and families?
This question is from a parent at SF Public Montessori.
Due to the popularity of the Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP), we are grateful that we do not need to issue any preliminary layoff notices to teachers across the district. This allows us to preserve consistency across our in-classroom teachers, and we want to thank everyone who took the SERP option to help us accomplish this.
Unfortunately, we still have to issue preliminary layoff notices to counselors, paraeducators, and other positions. We are also working to consolidate our teaching positions so we can ensure that every classroom has a qualified teacher.
We are committed to our student outcomes. While these cuts are significant, they represent 10% of our budget. We must work together to reimagine how we can use the remaining 90% of our budget to support our students. We will continue to invest in educators’ professional development so there is a high-quality teacher in every classroom so we can support all our students.
Why is the district hampering schools by getting rid of assistant principal positions and pushing a burden onto already overworked principals?
This question is from a parent at Aptos Middle School.
The principals and assistant principals at our schools have big jobs and do amazing work. Most middle and high schools have been allocated assistant principals, and Aptos Middle School should have two assistant principals in their staff allocations.
In addition, all schools, including elementary schools, can use their site discretionary funding for an assistant principal position. Our supplemental hiring guidelines provide clarity on the process to pay for assistant principal positions.
How are nurses not seen as essential staff for schools? We have kids with diabetes at our school, and they need more immediate attention should anything go wrong.
This question is from a parent at Chinese Immersion School at De Avila.
Nurses are absolutely essential staff at our schools. They play a critical role and are essential for our students with specialized health care needs. We are not reducing the number of school district nurses.
We will continue to provide all students who require specialized nursing services with those services at their school site. We are moving to a cohort model to allow for more equitable access and reduce the need to contract out for agency nurses.
If a counselor with less seniority than a counselor who got consolidated from another site, is it possible for the counselor with less seniority at the current site to be replaced by another counselor with higher seniority and same language skills?
Or does the principal have a say in keeping their current staff, even if that person has less seniority?
This question is from an employee at Thurgood Marshall Academic High School.
In general, staff members with more seniority may "bump" another staff member in the same classification with less seniority.
The process of moving staff into different positions is governed by rules established by the California Education Code and through SFUSD’s collective bargaining agreements with our labor partners. The Human Resources department has provided a consolidation guide to all sites, and they will also be hosting informational webinars for site leaders who may have questions about the consolidation process on March 19 and 20.
Budget Cuts
Link to this section
18% of questions submitted
How do the proposed budget cuts to schools compare to any proposed budget cuts to the central office?
This question is from a parent at AP Giannini Middle School and Francis Scott Key Elementary School.
We are reorganizing key central office functions as part of our budget reduction strategy. Superintendent Su has asked all central office departments to propose a minimum of 20% reductions in staffing and contracts, with a priority on reducing management and director positions. Every central office certificated administrator received a preliminary notice that they may be released or reassigned for the following school year.
Next month, we will bring a proposal to the SF Board of Education that will include reductions of classified central office administrators.
Back in early February, the Board allowed the district to release temporary certificated employees on one-year contracts and to release or reassign certificated administrators on probationary status. Later in February, the Board authorized the release of preliminary layoff notices for 395 certificated staff and 164 classified paraeducators.
In the coming months, SFUSD will request Board approval to issue preliminary layoff notices to 43 central office classified administrators and 86 classified civil servants.
How will teachers support the educational needs of their students and devise a curriculum for new split-grade classes (such as a combined 2nd/3rd grade class)? What guidance and support will be provided to make sure our students and teachers succeed?
This question is from a parent at Lakeshore Alternative Elementary School.
SFUSD recognizes that teaching combination grade levels will present new ways of planning and delivering the curriculum. We have adopted curricula that are standards based, and teachers can make instructional decisions based on the curricula and the learning needs of their students.
In terms of specific support, we have instructional coaches who will continue to support teachers in differentiating and managing grade-level standards in combination classrooms. There is also robust professional development with specific guidance that will be provided to teachers in combination classrooms.
There was a proposal to close certain school sites to save money, and there is the current proposal to make budget cuts. Is there a side-by-side comparison of savings from those two proposals?
Question continued: It would be good to see options for the district cuts, including the idea of consolidating schools.
This question is from a parent at Lowell High School and Ruth Asawa School of the Arts.
There are no school closures planned for the 2025-26 school year.
We are very excited to see an increase in kindergarten and transitional kindergarten (TK) applications. Just this year, we received over 700 TK applications and over 150 kindergarten applications for the 2025-26 school year, which is a move in the right direction. Before we start the closure conversation, we need to make sure we are maximizing our assets to their best uses. In order to find classrooms for over 700 TK students, we have to go into existing schools to see if there are classrooms we can convert. We need to be smart about using our current vacancies.
We also need to make our operations more efficient. This includes putting position controls in place and improving oversight and accountability measures so we are always mindful of how much money we are spending and toward what goals. We also will continue monitoring our enrollment trends. Once we do this, we will have a better handle on our budget and have a clearer understanding on next steps necessary to take if there is a school closure conversation.
SFUSD School Programs
Link to this section
10% of questions submitted
How will Individual Education Plans (IEPs) be affected? What resources will be kept? What resources will be cut?
This question is from a parent at Aptos Middle School and Dianne Feinstein Elementary School.
The services agreed upon in a student’s Individual Education Plan (IEP) are required by law, and SFUSD must commit to and implement those plans. We have a legal and moral obligation to make sure that students in special education are receiving the support they need to access a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). We are committed to ensuring that these resources are funded and available to our students with IEPs.
On top of the legal mandates to ensure we are supporting students in special education, we are also reimagining our strategic investments in special education. This means continuing our work to strengthen the continuum of services for special education and investing in early intervention with the youngest children in our schools. For example, our Shoestrings program in the Bayview provides our transitional kindergarten (TK) students with Tier 3 level services so they do not end up in higher-need special education programs later in their academic career.
This is the kind of innovative investment we need to make as a district so we can serve our students better by providing them with what they need early on and make sure we don’t over identify young people in middle and high school into special education. We are committed to looking at how to reinvest and reimagine special education services and funding.
Which student programs (e.g., arts, music, sports, special education, counseling) are at risk of being reduced or eliminated?
This question is from a parent at Claire Lilienthal Alternative School.
We will continue to provide those services mandated by law, such as our special education services, which are also our moral obligation.Middle schools and high school students will continue to have counseling programs as we continue to align those counseling services and allocations with contractual agreements and state guidelines.
In San Francisco, we are fortunate to have the voter-supported Public Education Enrichment Fund (PEEF) for our sports, libraries, and arts and music programs. These programs will continue though based on revenue projections from the city and based on school enrollment.
I understand there are plans to change the Spanish language immersion to a 50/50 model (50% in Spanish and 50% in English). What is the research and evidence that this model is effective? Also, why is this program being targeted for budget cuts?
This question is from a parent at Leonard R. Flynn Elementary School.
This program is not being targeted for budget cuts.
We are committed to providing excellent multilingual programs to each and every student.
We are working with the District English Learners Advisory Committee (DELAC) on this proposed change. The change is meant to help us meet our legal obligation and to improve student outcomes for Spanish-speaking Latinx students. Most importantly, the 50/50 model will serve each and every student across languages and across backgrounds.
Long-Term Fiscal Strategy
Link to this section
7% of questions submitted
We are entering kindergarten in the fall and questioning if SFUSD will be able to provide our child with the education and experiences we want and they deserve. What reassurance can you give us about the years ahead?
This question is from a parent at Argonne Early Education School.
First and foremost, thank you for choosing SFUSD.
We still have 90% of our budget to ensure that our school district is healthy and that we have the resources necessary to serve each and every student. In this new context, we will provide every classroom with a qualified teacher. We will continue providing our teachers with the professional development they need to be successful so they can implement all the new curricula we are rolling out.
We will have full implementation of our literacy curriculum across our elementary schools. We will be adopting new K-8 math curriculum. We are reorganizing central office so that we are aligning College and Career Readiness with high schools. We are aligning data and research with Curriculum and Instruction. We are making sure our operations make sense and that we are efficient in delivering the services our families and students need. This means providing our teachers with a seamless experience in the district.
This is what it will take for SFUSD to move into the next phase of our work. This is the radical reimagination that needs to happen in partnership with the community. We invite everyone to come together and imagine how that would look like. How is your kindergartener going to experience their first day of school? How will they work through all their literacy and math programs and move on to middle and high school? How will they be successful as a high school graduate of SFUSD?
How does SFUSD reconcile the immediate fiscal stabilization measures with a long-term strategy for school viability and budget balance?
Specifically, can the Board assure the community that these actions will definitely close the deficit and eliminate the possibility of school closures within the next 2-3 years, or are these measures simply delaying inevitable future closures?
This question is from a parent at Chinese Immersion School at De Avila.
We cannot be where we are now in two years. We need to be in a much better place because we would have implemented our budget stabilization plan, which requires us to take very decisive and painful reductions in our budget. Once our budget has been stabilized, we will have the ability and the autonomy to make our own financial decisions. Before we start conversations about school closures, we need to focus on delivering a balanced budget and making sure that we utilize all of our assets to the best of our abilities.
We have over 700 new transitional kindergarteners coming into our school district, and we need to find space for those students. If our enrollment continues to increase, we will need to find even more space in the future. We need to be proactive in thinking about how we do this. We also need to make hard decisions around our operations and how to achieve the level of efficiency that our staff, our students, and our families expect from us. We have to do a better job at maximizing our assets, at ensuring that we fulfill our promises, and at having better accountability about the work we do.
We will continue to monitor the enrollment trends, make sure that we are spending within our means, and radically reimagine what we will do with the remaining 90% of our budget. That is how we will achieve our goals of literacy proficiency, math proficiency, and college and career readiness for our students.
After completing the $113 million cut, what will be the source of income from SFUSD so that we can be stable and then grow as needed?
This question is from a parent at AP Giannini Middle School and Lowell High School.
After the cut, we still have $1.2 billion in our budget. 5% of this is from the federal government, 70% is from the State of California, and 20% is from the City and County of San Francisco.
The 70% from the state is based on our enrollment. Over the last few years our expenses steadily increased as we experienced trends of declining enrollment. This created a large gap between our expenditures and our revenue, which is why we have to make this budget cut. Once we complete the budget cut, we will continue to work on keeping our expenditures in line with our revenue.
When that happens, the California Department of Education (CDE) will hopefully lift the sanctions currently imposed on us. It will be very difficult making these reductions, but once we do, we will inspire confidence in our system with our community and provide stability for our staff. More importantly, we will then be able to recruit even more people to come because people will know this is a district that is stable, solvent, and able to manage our resources. When we have stability and predictability for our staff, we can better provide stability and predictability for our students, which is what they need to grow, learn, and thrive.
Once we are at this point, hopefully the external community will also gain the confidence to invest in us and enable us to do the creative and innovative things that San Francisco is known for.
How does the district plan to support both newcomer immigrant children and LGBTQ populations? Could you elaborate on the plans moving forward?
This question is from an employee at Everett Middle School.
First and foremost, SFUSD is a sanctuary district within a sanctuary city. This means that we have the protection of the law from the City and County of San Francisco, which is only one reason why it's so important to have a strong partnership between the city and SFUSD. The Mayor of San Francisco and City Attorney David Chiu are working with us to protect our students and uphold our sanctuary laws.
Public education is the bedrock of this democracy, and San Francisco Unified School District is the bedrock of San Francisco. Given the recent rhetoric at the federal level, we recognize that many people in our community are hurting and scared, and we encourage you to stand strong. For decades, San Francisco public schools have been at the forefront of celebrating diversity and affirming the rights of all students regardless of their identities, backgrounds, or lived experiences. We will continue to implement state laws and SFUSD policies so all our students and staff can learn and grow in a welcoming atmosphere. We will work with the city and the state to ensure that we stay true to these values. We will not waiver.
In addition, the Queer Trans Parent Advisory Council was successfully launched in the fall, empowering families to advocate for our LGBTQ+ community. SFUSD will remain steadfast and laser focused in our work of educating all of our students.
Virtual Town Hall Q&A
Link to this section
Questions below were received from the survey and asked by a student, parents/caregiver, or district employee.
AAPAC
Why and When will AAPAC/Honor Roll will be posted; rescheduled? Mary Su, you said in Spring. Please honor what you said. And for the record, its Always been in February. |
Arabic
SFUSD has a lot of Arabic speaking families who are interested in attending this town hall, please include the Arabic interpretation. Thank you! |
Budget Cuts
Why are so mant student-facing positions being cut? Can you break down the cuts in terms of positions tgat directly interface with students versus other positions such as district administration? Where are tgere opportunities for SFUSD to generate more revenue such as with tge rewk estate that it holds? |
Please highlight how the current plans for addressing the budget deficit differs from the prior leadership & how these changes are believed to represent improvements on strategies that have been discarded or modified. |
How do the proposed budget cuts to the schools compare to any proposed budget cuts to the central office? Please provide easily accessible data for comparison. |
Why are there so many cuts to **student-facing** positions in comprehensive high schools that are already stretched to the maximum?! |
The districted talked about cutting 46 counselors in the district. If a school had a counselor with less seniority than a counselor who got consolidated from another site, is it possible for the counselor with less seniority at the current site be replaced by another counselor with higher seniority and same language skills? Or the principal could just have a say to keep their current staff even if that person has less seniority? Why are counselors at the top of the list in the district getting cut? |
Instead of cutting the jobs of teachers and paraprofessionals who have been at the front line for our children’s education, have you ever thought off cutting 1-3 positions in the BOE who make 100xs more income . Cutting just one person who make $500K -800k a year would save 10 teachers and possibly 20 paraprofessional positions ? Maybe ask some people on the administration to write 5 task they completes in a month and we will see where the budget should be spent . |
My 10th grader at Washington told me that they may drop down to 6 periods next year at Washington. I want to how this is a good idea if we expect students to graduate and get into UC schools. Will other high schools (e.g. Lowell) also be forced to suffer these bad cuts? |
How can we have layoffs when we have vacancies. Our schools aren't adequately staffed and we are making further cuts. Why didin't we let Wayne have school closures when it is clearly needed? How much fear is there around cuts in federal funding? Why are we increasingly pushing towards the privatization of our public schools: hiring contractors for jobs where people would like to be direct employees of the district ie Speech Language Pathologists and Paraeducators. |
SFUSD has known about this budget shortfall since October, yet instead of making a real plan, the district waited until now to roll out sudden cuts that disrupt schools and leave families scrambling. Why wasn’t action taken sooner to prevent this crisis, and what is SFUSD’s long-term plan to keep schools stable beyond these short-term cuts? |
How do you rationalize cutting funding, having. split classes, and sending pink slips to title 1 schools that are hard to staff? Across the board cuts is not equitable! |
Why Does the district use an average total cost for discretionary grant funded positions? These should be the highest pay grade to cover the all of the actual cost since difficult to determine what pay grade the job classification the grant funded employee is in. |
Though it was politicized in a way that prevented constructive discussion, the school closure plan is an obvious solution to consolidating resources for well supported schools, instead of spreading less resources across the same number of school sites. Though painful, when will you bring this option back into consideration for stabilization of budget and site-level resources?? |
Does budget development factor into the possibility of school closures again? Our school was on the list to be closed for 25-26 year. However, with Matt Wayne out of the picture school closures were no longer talked about and schools that were on the closure list were told that they will remain open. This needs to be brought up again especially in thinking ahead for 26-27 school year. Community outreach and staff engagement in the process needs to happen like NOW if that is on the table again. |
To be blunt, my impression is that you were a political hire under the former mayor who bludgeoned the City Administration's relationship with school district and scapegoated Board Members and employees for many of her failings. My question is have you partnered with new Mayor, who I understand has significant economic ties and other resources, to come up with creative ways that salvage SFUSD shortfalls. My other question is whether you really considered the prior plan to to consolidate and potentially close some schools. I personally like the idea of consolidation and schools-within-schools. I don't believe that balancing the budget by eliminating hundreds of educators and student facing personnel is the answer to SFUSD budget shortfalls -- I say trim the fat at the district level, consolidate school sites where appropriate and come up with a carefully crafted strategic plan -- vs a slash and burn effort that will directly affect the quality of education SF students receive. The schools are already understaffed, under resourced, and students are already suffering. We need emergency stop gap funding (Mayor???) and a strategic plan that involves the input of community constituents. What do you say to this?????? |
Given current enrolment (historically low and still trending down) it seems essential to close/merge some schools as soon as possible. It also seems impossible to balance the budget without doing so. When will school closures be properly considered? When will they happen? And why has this been put off for so long? Larger schools with a greater range of resources and more resilience will be better for students. Please consolidate schools now. |
If budget only needs to be reduced by .09% (113 million of 1.3 billion) why is this a crisis? Have the tech companies been approached for assistance? |
What the future looks like for Yick Wo, Spring Valley and Jean Parker? Are they staying opened/merged/closed? Is the budget cut will impact these schools? |
Last October, our daughter was hospitalized with DKA and diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. This is not uncommon there are 100s of students with T1D in SF, but is terrifying. Just over a week after diagnosis she went back to middle school. This was possible because Roosevelt has a wonderful full time nurse that we could rely on to support her as she learned how to deal with insulin management. She is about to go into high school, and we have only applied to schools with full time nurses. Kids with Diabetes can suffer low blood sugar incidents that require prompt and experienced interventions that nurses are trained to handle, and we can't expect the already burdened teachers to learn to handle. This is a question of equity, and ADA compliance. This is a life or death question. Nurses save lives, cutting them will mean unnecessary deaths. In this, the 10th wealthiest city in the world, home of Sam Altman, and Marc Benioff, we can afford nurses, paras and councillors in our schools. |
Closing under enrolled schools should not be eliminated as an option to balance the budget. Closing schools is the better option than reducing teachers, programs, and key staff. Families impacted at schools closing can be supported by enrolling in a school with siblings as a priority. In order to bring families back to SFUSD, enrollment needs to increase. In order to do that, the curriculum needs to be de-politicized and focused on the academic needs of students from across the spectrum. Bringing back honors classes and AP classes are key. |
How does the SFUSD board reconcile the immediate fiscal stabilization measures, which directly impact classroom resources and PTA contributions, with a long-term strategy for school viability and budget balance? Specifically, can the board assure the community that these actions will definitively close the $113 million budget deficit and eliminate the possibility of school closures within the next 2-3 years, or are these measures simply delaying inevitable future closures? . |
What are the ways the school district is working to reduce the deficit that are truly away from students like the real estate portfolio and central office? |
Who is in charge here? How did the problem develop? What is being done to solve the problem? What is the role of the State of Califorjnia in this budgetary stabilization effort? |
Dr. Wayne resigned in the face of pushback to his RAI plan to close schools. I never quite understood the pushback on this, and now I wonder if closing schools is still on the table. Why are we keeping under-enrolled schools open and taking resources from all the other schools? |
Will there be any discussion of school closures? I understand that the process in the fall was not as fair and equitable as possibly, but surely we need to consolidate at least some school, given our declining enrollment. All students would better off if we didn't have to stretch resources thin. |
[fourth grade student] Will these budgets affect our school years?Will we have split classes?Will we be able to have education the same way we do now? |
Question from a fourth grade student: Why do we have only one principal without an assistant if it means our school can't be handled better? Why are we going to have more students in each class, meaning for crowded classrooms, and less learning experience? How does taking away our materials and teachers help educate us in certian ways? |
Why are there budget concerns in one of the most affluent areas of the country? Where is all the tax money going? Is there a solution that involves less admins (value detractors) and more higher-paid teachers (value creators) |
There’s no scenario where SFUSD doesn’t close schools on the next 5 years. When are we going to have plans to close at least some schools, instead of dragging down the entire district |
Will school closures be rediscussed as a potential option? Are language immersion programs at jeopardy? Why can’t we use PTA funds to close the school gaps? What’s the timeline from here to avoid a state takeover? What can we do on a state level to advocate for SFUSD? |
What are the benefits for cutting budgets?from 4th grade student |
Will our students still learn all topics in split classes that are big?from 4th grade student |
Why do we need to force split classes. |
Would class size increase? If so how would that affect us as students from teachers needing to focus on more peers? (Question ask by a four grater BROOKLYN ROSAS at Gordon J Lau |
How many students are going to be in each class? What are you going to cut? Is there going to be less computers? Is it going to be a split class Is it going to be less material.How many class will be cut at Gordon J. Lau Elementary? The reason for the budget cuts? From fourth grade |
Under these budget constraints, why are we not closing schools? When the school resources are so spread so thin, we can consolidate optimize the resources and provide better quality education. Students in low enrollment schools merged to other schools will benefit from higher performing schools. |
Why in God's name is Peer Resources being cut? It's a support program for the most vulnerable students!! The district is cutting it like it's a central office cost when in fact it supports sites directly! |
Based on my personal experience going through the SFUSD enrollment process, and the stories I hear from other parents, it becomes painfully clear that the enrollment declines and funding losses are self inflicted. Research is clear that the segregation is worse now than when the lottery school choice started. It is outrageous that in the most technologically advanced region of the world, students have to wait until school starts to see who does/doesn’t show up do figure out how many seats can be given to wait pool students. Identifying these inefficient and inequitable administrative systems will make it clear where the $113M in cuts can come from. The entire enrollment division needs to go. Teachers and direct service providers are doing the best with limited resources while inefficient administrative systems only make problems worse. |
Why are we cutting teachers when there is a teacher shortage in SFUSD? Why are you not considering closing under-enrolled schools now to meet this budget? |
1) When do you expect the district to reach 92% in order to open up the “on hold” positions for hiring, particularly ARTIF? 2) For Class Size Reduction positions, what is the reason for not allowing them at all? Has there been thought around how schools to transition out of having a CSR when they have had a CSR for multiple years? 3) What is the reasoning for reducing enrollment capacity in Argonne’s grades 1& 2 - is it to justify losing a teacher? Are you aware that losing that teacher will force class sizes of 23-25 for all 1st and 2nd graders? |
1. Why was school closure abruptly taken off the table with zero input from staff? We were told for years that this would happen and that in fact it will still happen, yet within days there was a complete reversal of a decision to close schools with no input from staff/ those that it would directly affect. 2.Why are proposed classroom size numbers higher than what is the class size number limit in the teacher contract? |
What is the current % of vacant classroom positions? Is the district trying to reach 92% capacity at EACH level of schools (elementary, middle school, high school) or 92% for all levels? Where are current open positions posted? |
If elementary school are combining gen ed classes, are you capping the enrollment? If so, how does that help the school? As a parent, it's really the teachers that makes the difference to my children. |
Why combo classes? If the school is succeeding, why not leave it be? There's a reason why some schools succeed and some don't. |
If the district closes a kinder class from 4 classes to 3, but there is overwhelming parent choice for that school will the district open a 4th class of kinders? If not, aren't we just discouraging more families from attending SFUSD? |
Are school closures still on the table? We'd rather see schools closed than teachers laid off. |
Class Size
Is school size factored in, particularly for larger school? If so, how? If not, why not? |
Community Engagement
How does the district plan to engage limited English proficient (LEP) families in stabilization plans? |
Department of Education (Federal)
If the current US president removes the board of education; how will this affect the budget for the SFUSD schools? |
How much of the budget is from the federal government/ Department of Education? What would the district do if our federal funding comes under threat? Is there a contingency plan for that? |
Education
Will the children still have great education and score great on test? |
Employee Budget Cuts
As an employee I want to voice concerns about all the cuts to services especially with the return to office 5 days a week mandate. The 135 Van Ness building has rodent issues that are consistent and VERY sparce custodial service. We were informed that there will be no increase in custodial service even with more usage and people in the building regularly. I want the leadership to know, that good, hardworking employees who enjoy the work we do, have a really hard time justifying staying when they work in unhealthy and unsanitary conditions that seem to have no remediation plan. This feels like a health hazard and obvious sanitation problem. I know funding is limited but you cannot just keep cutting services and expect all staff to just deal with the conditions. Thank you. |
EmpowerSF
Does the SFUSD acknowledge financial mismanagement, notably the Empower software system which made egregious and costly errors such as canceling employee health care insurance, failure to issue paychecks, erroneous calculation of sick days and vacation days and other errors? As follow-up, does the district acknowledge that it failed not only to put the contract out for competitive bidding, but also did not require Empower creators to guarantee to repair glitches? How many millions of dollara did the SFUSD throw down the toilet, counting purchase price and price tag for repairs to Empower? Thank you for taking responsibility. OR does the district deny fiscal mismanagent? |
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF)
Have the Superintendent and BOE asked Mayor Lurie to fully fund our public schools by using excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs that will harm our students and our community. Mayor Lurie committed to supporting public schools during his campaign and this would be a concrete way he could follow through on that promise. |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Has the district asked the mayor to use excess ERAF (almost $300 million for FY 25-26) help fully fund SFUSD this year? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? Why is the district prioritizing firing of teachers rather than utilize private funding? If equity is important why do some student groups get more support than others? Has the district researched austerity measures to include food that is wasted and other non-academic needs? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD, and if not, why not? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Can SFUSD get more of the Excess ERAF money that currently goes to the city? If not, why not? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
“Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Did Superintendent Su ask Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Funding
Can the superintendent and the BOE make a formal request to the Mayor and BOS to allocate all of ERAF monies for this year to SFUSD to help avoid cuts and layoffs? |
Future
Has the district considered ramping up philanthropy and creating a centralized nonprofit fund similar to Palo Alto to get more money into schools? |
How can the City of San Francisco help with funding our public schools? Other cities have a higher percentage of their taxes go to the schools. How can additional resources be allocated? |
Why can’t the city give a higher percentage of property tax revenues to fund the schools? Why are we at such low standards? To attract more families back to the district we should be providing competitive programs. |
Given the challenges facing the district, what steps are being considered that seek long term revenue increases for SFUSD budgets? This could include pooling of school site funds in this cycle so as to prevent combo classes and ensure high needs schools have all populations appropriately resourced; this could also look like seeking additional revenue from the city by way of a number of proposed measures (too long to outline here). Point is: instead of continuing to cut public education, how can we increase funding and ensure we aren’t a city with the highest percentage of students in private education? |
I’d like to know why the district abandoned plans to close unnecessary schools.in order to help close the budget shortfall. It does not make financial sense to keep the same amount of schools open with less children in the district. Allowing a student to remain at an under performing school because of what I assume are logistical concerns, or inconvenience on my sets up that student for failure in the greater , not always easy world. |
Please explain how one of the wealthiest cities, in a state that is the world’s fifth largest economy, doesn’t have enough money to pay for a moderate education for a relatively low child population? How are we not able to use our obscene wealth to be the education envy of the country? If any state could do it, it should be us — so who is dropping what SHOULD be a relatively easy-to-not-drop ball? |
Hiring Freeze
Why is it that sites can only use site funds to pay for a nurse that doesn't already work for the district? Especially when their is a hiring freeze on meaning that we can't actually hire a nurse meaning we can't actually have a nurse at our site. |
Layoffs
Who is going to take up the work at sites of all of the counselors, social workers, assistant principals, and nurses that are being cut? Who is going to be serving our most vulnerable students? |
Since it's really closing the budget, get rid of horrible teachers. You'll know by the complaints of the parents and students. Get rid of useless top level. It's the district level that cause the misuse of funds. Don't pass the problem to the elementary school levels. |
How do layoffs affect teachers enrolled in the Induction program? |
How are we, as a district, better off by choosing to layoff school staff across the whole district--affecting the ability of all sites to meet the demands of the same amount of work--instead of closing and merging the under enrolled school sites that were previously proposed? |
Legal Action
What is being done to claw back any funds inappropriately spent (e.g., on failed software), or stolen or misappropriated, and what legal action has been taken? Have restitution claims, complaints for breach of contract (e.g., against any contractor for failure to provide service), been filed? Have any complaints been filed with CalDOJ or USDOJ? Please detail any actions being taken to hold any responsible parties accountable AND to recoup any funding inappropriately spent/stolen. Thank you. |
Mayoral Assistance
How is mayor Laurie helping? |
Mission Bay School
Why are we building and funding a new school at Mission Bay with a price tag of $100 million, when that money could be used to improve existing schools such as Drew in Bayview (12mins away) and Bessie Carmichael in SOMA (8mins away)? |
Nurses
How are you working to keep a school nurse at each middle school ? Agency nurses do not have the skill set that our school nurses have. There is a hiring freeze so if we lose our nurses, our school cannot hire another one. |
Programs
Has the budget taken into account the impact of the changes to the immersion programs? We need to be very careful with our resources at the moment. Adjusting 80/20 programs that have higher reclassification rates than 50/50 programs does not seem like the right thing to do. |
How are nurses not seen as essential staff for schools? We have kids with diabetes at our school that need more immediate attention should anything go wrong. |
How is the budget being developed to ensure all required Special Education services are being provided by trained staff? How is the budget development ensuring that all staff have required training? What data tools are being employed to ensure budget cuts do not set the district for law suits based on failure to provide FAPE, dyslexic services required by state law and other possible Williams complaints based on the lack of staff or the lack of appropriately trained staff? |
How will you maintain support for students with Special Needs according to legal mandates of IEPs |
What plans do you have to protect the newcomer program for Spanish speaking students ? (As they are the vulnerable among the vulnerable, experiencing homelessness and government discrimination)? Also, How are you including the community in these decisions? No input was requested from our families and staff on the impact your budget decisions would have on our students and families. The community school model utilizes a shared decision making protocol. |
Will you cut off classes for next year? Will we have to pay for the lunches next year? |
Considering the importance of college counseling in helping students navigate higher education and career pathways, how will the board address the budget deficit without significantly reducing these essential services |
How does removing the programs and staff that support our students - from nurses to social workers to Peer Resources, etc. square with being first and foremost "student centered"? |
What are the budget implications for Special Education services especifically around Speech, OT, paras, etc.? |
When will you reinstate the RSP teacher at McKinley Elementary to ensure students with IEPs receive the necessary support they are legally entitled to? |
What changes are under consideration for Mandarin Immersion (e.g., consolidating or eliminating programs, curriculum changes, etc)? |
Who is going to assure vaccination adherence when we don't have school nurses at our schools, especially in New Comer schools? |
If one of the goals is to get more parents in SF, who maybe turning to private school, have we thought about scaling out the Mandarin program? I have had calls with a lot (15+) parents who would rather be a part of SFUSD Mandarin Immersion. It seems like a great opportunity to engage more of our community. |
PTA
Two questions. 1. On Tuesday, people held up "Sanctuary" signs. Is San Francisco still a Sanctuary City, and if so, how is SFUSD actively supporting this? 2. Why exactly are PTA teacher funds no longer being allowed to fund additional teachers? |
Why are we restricting what PTA's are allowed to do with their funds? Won't that disincentivize PTAs from raising money and thus having less money for the budget? Feels like this just makes the budget problem worse, and nudges more parents into enrolling into private |
Why are you restricting the voices and budgets of PTA when it will not be helping with the $113million deficit. You should be allowing parents to use the funds as they need fit to support the schools as you are cutting the budgets. Many of the things that are "not allowed" have been implemented at existing schools for years and has a history of sustainability. I urge you to reconsider the restriction of PTA funding and allow schools to fund what is needed to their specific school site. The school/teachers and parents know best about what is needed for their sites. |
We have raised money this year knowing there would be a budget deficit and we could help. Why are you changing the rules so late in the school year without engaging with PTAs in this process? |
All schools should have the right to spend their fundraiser money in the way they know is best for their schools. The parents at each school know the community best and can spend title 1 money, PTA money, and all grant money. We have invited you to our school multiple times and no one has come to learn about us. How can we trust that these decisions have our school in their best interest? |
Why don’t you allow the PTA to pay for our teachers? Our school is better for it. |
Why are you not allowing PTA funds to pay for teaching positions, further eroding parents' confidence in SFUSD's ability to educate our children? |
Can you please explain WHY you are prohibiting the use of PTA funds to hire extra teachers? At a time when we have a budget deficit and are preparing for mass layoffs, I struggle to understand why you would prevent extra funds to be channeled into the resource that can make the most difference on academic achievement, that is, teachers. I have heard several arguments online: 1..equity - but this move is strictly negative for SFUSD students, it's not like we are taking from some to give to other who need more, we are just pulling avaialable funds away from students altogether. 2. Staffing concerns: we need a teacher in front of every classroom. Hell yeah! But if we are laying offs dozens and dozens of teachers, surely we must not be concerned about not having enough teachers? 3. costs: there might be ancillary costs born by the district when a supplemental teaching position is funded by external dollars. Well, let's make sure the fully loaded cost is covered by the external funding. |
Please clearly explain how PTA funding can be used. Our school thrives with "consultants" providing art, PE and other support servcies. Please clarify if those will need to change or in general how parents can support schools. This point has been very confusing. We want to support students and ensure high quality resources. |
I am a parent and a teacher in SFUSD (the form does not allow for more than one choice). I am concerned that school PTOs are not allowed to use their funds as needed to fill positions that the District does not feel are necessary. WHY? |
Why would the district NOT fund or "allow" (even if PTO funded) ARTIFs (Reading Specialists) especially with the new mandated universal reading screenings next school year (dyslexia related)? If you do not provide reading intervention, you will have more referrals for testing for possible special education services. We have a community of parents who are highly involved in the topic of dyslexia. |
Vs Can you explain why you insist that PTA funds can’t be used to help support better education for our kids specific by school need? If SFUSD cannot guarantee the best education possible across the board due to budget restrictions why can’t parents help to make education better and support what our common goal is? |
Why does your website say that the District does not control PTA funding, but is saying PTAs can't support what they like? "Parent teacher organizations are 3rd-party organizations, and SFUSD does not determine how those funds are used. The Supplemental Hiring Guidelines provides information for these organizations to make strategic decisions in how they use their resources to support their specific school community. The guidelines are designed to ensure consistency and equity in school staffing practices across the district. " Link: https://www.sfusd.edu/about-sfusd/budget-and-lcap/budget-faqs/supplemental-hiring-guidelines?search_api_fulltext=Supplemental%20hiring%20guide&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR27vRXS2JSnv_hr6hKCsIjBciwse35fWCiSXbbu_23Q4tV3G9ffqP-fnw4_aem_ivkxrwUGseBeluvWfFGhaQ&link_id=3&can_id=41d94fc9fce4249b95be92fe829c2a7f&source=email-rsvp-for-tomorrows-meeting-with-sfusds-state-fiscal-advisor&email_referrer=email_2650850&email_subject=painful-sfusd-budget-cuts-and-how-parents-can-help#77745 |
Have you done a site-specific analysis of increased costs resulting from eliminating PTA-funded class-size-reduction (CSR) teachers, including for example physical plant costs, costs of a sweeping curriculum change, and costs of meeting district obligations to students with IEPs that grow upon removal of the CSR teacher? If so, what costs have been identified (types and amounts) and how will the district cover them? |
If Peabody is not allowed to use PTA money to fund teachers, we will lose our reading resource teacher along with other important teachers and staff. Why do you want to withhold resources from struggling readers when we have PTA funds to cover them? I struggle to understand why a school board would put forth a proposal that denies resources to students who need them when those resources are already funded. |
Please summarize the evaluation performed and current stance around site-specific PTSA fundraising to supplement gaps in district-funded resources at school sites (current practice), and what variations and alternatives have been considered, e.g., district-level pooling of school sites' PTSA-raised funds for more equitable resource/funding allocation. How have benefits, risks, concerns, and opportunities been evaluated and quantified? What decisions have been made? What decisions have been made? What decisions are still outstanding with respect to site-specific PTSA fundraising and SFUSD’s budget and stabilization efforts? |
Please let PTO's spend their money however they choose to in the best interest of the children. If there is a shortage of teachers, it does not make sense to lay off any of them while figuring out where to put them. |
Why will you not allow PTA or Title 1 funds to be used to keep ARTIF (reading interventionist) that have contributed significantly to reading improvements for our students? |
Eliminating or restricting the ability of PTAs to fund CSR at a community level sends an unintended message—that community involvement in education is neither valued nor encouraged. |
Has the district considered pooling PTA funds instead of restricting their spending? There are other districts following this model. |
PTO Funded Positions: SFUSD's mischaracterization of PTO funded staff positions as an equity issue is deceptive. My kids' school (Argonne) gets less SSC funding than others and the amount we fund doesn't come close to covering the gap between schools in better funded tiers. Will SFUSD publicly acknowledge the funding differential between Tier 1, 2, and 3 schools in its public communications? |
Are cuts prioritized to admin roles/non direct student impacting roles happening first, 2) Why should policies put restrictions on how individual schools apply their PTA funding? 3) There seems to be a large misconception about the need for cuts and many parents/children are pleading for them not to happen. What type of feedback has been solicited from families about how the balance can be budgeted? Perhaps this can help more families understand there is no way around cuts if we don't have enough children to fill schools. |
Can you better explain why there are restrictions on using PTA funds for staffing? These are resources that are additive to the District's budget and many PTAs have a long track record of being able to provide these funds annually. It seems like we should be maximizing all available resources to achieve the best outcomes for the students. Thank you. |
Recording
Can you please record meeting and share recording for those who are unable to make the meeting? |
School Closings
Why are the schools that were slated to be closed not closing to help with the budget issue? |
There was a proposal to close certain school sites to save money, and there is the current proposal to make cuts. Is there a side-by-sdie comparison of savings from those two proposals? It would be good to see options for the district cuts, including the idea of consolidating schools. |
San Francisco Urban Teacher Residency Program (SFUTR)
What does next year's employment opportunities look like for SFUTR members/incoming teachers? |
What does this mean for SFUTR residents now and in the future? What does this mean for incoming new teachers in general? |
Title 1 Funding Cuts
Why are you proposing to eliminate Title I and PTA funded classroom size reduction teachers? Blocking them only harms students, and does nothing to improve outcomes or help underserved schools. Given the district’s fiscal crisis, we should be expanding funding opportunities, not restricting them. |
Town Hall In-Person
This town hall should absolutely be IN person! I have been denied public comment TWICE! What are you afraid of?! |
Voluntary Transfer Period
Will the voluntary transfer period for teachers proceed normally? |
Waiver for Overcrowded Class Size
Our school is facing a cut of 2 teachers which would make our class size over 30. While this is legally ok, this doesn’t actually fit in our classroom spaces. We got a waiver that would limit class size due to this. However with the reductions, we’d have to pack in students like sardines. Will our previous waiver be respected? How do we change this so we don’t have a class so full our children can’t move! Thank you. |
Can high priority schools be considered for a waiver to allow for a class size reduction teacher to reduce class sizes avoid combo classes? This seems like a misguided attempt at equity but it's hurting the students who need it like ours with less than 10% of students performing at grade level, over 25% newcomer and homeless identified students. Thank you. |
Miscellaneous
I'm a parent of an SFUSD student recently diagnosed with insulin-dependent Type 1 Diabetes, an autoimmune disease. I'm deeply worried that if SFUSD takes the financial decision to move full time nurses out of schools into a central location and cut contract nurses, this decision may endanger the health of T1D students like my daughter, has the potential to reduce her equal access to public education, and might constitute disability discrimination. Many children with Type 1 diabetes now wear continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) to track their blood glucose. The American Diabetes Association Safe at School's guidance states that CGM systems with remote monitoring reduces hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, improves health for T1D students, and provides considerable psychosocial benefits for these students and their families. My recently diagnosed student wears a CGM and is currently 'followed' by their school nurse, who can monitor her blood glucose in real time and quickly respond to a CGM alarm during the school day. Having a trained, experienced on-site nurse following my T1d student's CGMs has ensured prompt, medically trained responses to her CGM alarms, helping prevent dangerous hypoglycemia events, which can happen at any time and requires quick intervention. The on-site school nurse also attends some gym classes so my child can safely exercise and can take part in field trips. The nurse being on site has helped her psychological adjustment to this new diagnosis through their full-time presence and support. My understanding is that moving nurses to a central location and cutting contracted nurses for budgetary reasons is not considered a legally adequate reason to reduce disability accommodations such as CGM monitoring for T1D students. SFUSD must remain in compliance with Title II of the Civil Rights Act, IDEA Section 504, and continue to meet ADA requirements for T1D kids. Parents with students living with TID need to know now what the district’s school nurse staffing plans are for next year–immediately and with full transparency–especially your public confirmation that any decision to centralize nurses and cut contracted nurses won't reduce safety, endanger children or reduce access to public education through reducing legally required accommodations. Students will be safest with full time school nurses on-site 5 days a week and no cuts to any nursing staff. Parents especially need SFUSD to stay the course to protect access to public education at this moment when the Federal Department of Education's Civil Rights Division has been cut. I want to know if the SFUSD school board can publicly confirm that any planned nursing changes by SFUSD have been vetted to ensure SFUSD will remain in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title II of the Civil Rights act, the California Board of Education’s health and safety requirements, and follow IDEA as is the law regarding 504 requirements and the implementation of individualized plans. |
Can you please explain more about the decision to disallow PTA funds from hiring teachers? Is it final? does it include teachers aides, other support staff? |
If we are in such a great budget crisis, how do we have money to do construction to add TK classrooms to the schools? Shouldn't we focus on the problem first instead of adding more money financial problems by doing construction? |
Cutting Budget: Is the sfusd eliminating Paraprofessions for disability children in the schools? Social Workers,Occupation Therapist, Paras, Behavior Specialist and Case Managers? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Why are high potential schools being punished with the 92% hiring rule even for certified positions that are not in competition with one another (i.e. elementary school certs vs high school)? Why is our grant money being held to fund already filled, data supported interventionalists while we are encouraged to waste it on posting more para positions when we already can’t fill those that are open? How will “cheaper” solutions like more paras across the district not create competition for the same limited workers among schools? Why is this process being run like we are a rural district with a captured workforce when our teachers can take a job one or two BART stops away in a different district? Does the state actually care if we are staffed at all, or in the end, is this just cuts at any cost with no counter metrics in place? |
How will music, the arts and athletics be affected by the proposed budget going forward? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Cómo piensa el distrito cubrir las necesidades y apoyos de los niños con necesidades especiales?os recortes de maestros en escuelas reducidas como mckinley impactará negativamente a nuestros niños deshabilitados si los estudiantes neuritipicos se están manifestando porque les afectará el recorte de maestros inmaginense a nuestros niños especiales que necesitan mucho apoyo en las escuelas inclusivas y reducidas ! |
Have the person/s been identified who falsely reported immunization compliance been weeded out? |
Budgeting on special education staffing |
I heard someone report at the BOE meeting that part of the district's budget problems are because of the immunization audit. The school nurse at my children's schools have been the person to make sure the students at the schools are compliant. Why are you moving nurses away from school sites when you need them there to help families keep their kids compliant? It seems like this is especially for schools who have large immigrant populations. |
Will school nurses be afforded the opportunity to design the cohort system of nursing allocation to sites? |
My daughter has an IEP. She does not have nursing services because her needs aren't that clear cut. If she was not able to check in with the school nurse for her physical symptoms from her anxiety, she would be truant. Doesn't the district get money for attendance? My daughter will probably miss a lot of school if she doesn't have the ability to check in with the nurse. |
After you have laid off teachers and moved some teachers to open positions in understaffed schools, how can you justify restricting funds that do not impact your bottom line (such as community grants, PTA etc)? You are simultaneously taking away district money to balance your budget (fine), but don’t ALSO take away our school’s ability to support our students as we are able. We don’t want an instructional coach or an AP—we want ONE teacher (paid for with NOT YOUR MONEY) to avoid FOUR combo classes. It defies logical sense. You can balance your budget, but let the community and schools use whatever other resources we have that do not impact your budget so we can meet the needs of students and not drive MORE kids out of public schools and into private |
How does the SFUSD board justify pulling public health nurses from schools with vulnerable immigrant populations? |
How does SFUSD’s budget development prioritize equity by ensuring that every school has a full-time nurse on-site, particularly for our focal students who rely on consistent healthcare access to thrive academically? |
Does SFUSD believe that offsite nurses can possibly develop trusting relationships with the families in our most vulnerable communities, because if not the cohort model will be utterly inadequate. |
Given SFUSD’s commitment to equity and student well-being, how does the budget ensure that every school, regardless of neighborhood or student demographics, has access to a full-time school nurse to support student success? |
How does SFUSD’s budget development process align with its strategic priorities to provide on-site nursing support, particularly for focal students who experience higher health-related barriers to learning? |
Will management also be reduced, or is SFUSD keeping the same amount of management even though there will be less teachers and services? |
What steps is SFUSD taking in its budget development to close the healthcare access gap in schools by funding on-site nurses, ensuring that all students—especially those from historically underserved communities—receive equitable health support? |
How does the budget reflect SFUSD’s commitment to student-centered funding by prioritizing on-site school nurses as a necessary investment for the health and academic success of focal student populations? |
Have Superintendent Su and the BOE asked Mayor Lurie to help fully fund our public schools by using Excess ERAF to prevent cuts and layoffs at SFUSD that will harm students and our community? |
Are there areas we can save money instead of cutting essential support staff? For example, as a teacher I know that the district is a spending lots of money on contracts that do not directly impact student learning and wellbeing. For example, Synergy, Dream box... We have spent tons of money on these sites but they are not necessarily comprehensive for our students. Good to have, but not essential. But school nurses and counselors are essential. Without them our black and brown students do not thrive and ready to learn. Please think outside of the box in terms of saving money!!!!! |
Given many proposals are in consideration for closing the SFUSD budget deficit, where can families find the actual text of proposals, in particular, the proposal to disallow use of PTA funds to fund class size reduction teachers that would affect programs such as the Mandarin Immersion programs at DeAvila and Starr King Elementary Schools? In the interest of transparency, how can parents and families follow along with all the budget cutting proposals being balanced against each other and considered, in order to appropriate weigh in, before a decision is made and a press release is issued? |
I noticed nursing is listed as critical to 'keeping the lights on' for schools. Could you please explain how that is being addressed at schools across the district |
I am the 7th grade ELA teacher at Willie Brown Middle School, a hard to staff school on the east side of the city, where I want to stay. Why can’t my administrators hire me back for the 25/26 school year? I have two clear, single subject credentials and have worked in this district in several capacities over 17 years. |
Can we reconsider allowing the State to take over SFUSD instead of resisting it at every turn? For years, SFUSD has repeatedly proven incapable of providing a quality education for our children—one of the most fundamental responsibilities of our society. From managing a $1.3 billion budget and overseeing multimillion-dollar real estate assets to implementing a payroll system despite spending $60 million, its failures are extensive. The list goes on. Please, let the State step in! |
In the current staffing model the district is only assigning one interventionist por school site , what is going to happen to school with high need like Guadalupe. At Guadalupe 70% of the students do not read at their level and we are going to need more? How is this going to be resolve. When is the hiring freeze going to be lifted. Why we spending 6.4 million dollars on bussing kids out communities instead of using the 6.4 million fund to hire more help for high need schools. Why schools not allow to used their community fund and their PTA fund to invest in our schools. |
How are we going to ensure the best quality of education for our students |
how can we can a basic minimum of transparency? We don't see final 2024-2025 budget on SFUSD web site. No draft of future 2025-2026 budget. FAQ/townhall are nice, but it's complimentary, you should give full transparency in basic numbers. |
How will this budget be handled, and does this budget are enough to used for all the USDF schools? |
If a credentialed school nurse is not at a school site long enough to be effective, how does the Cabinet/Leadership plan to enforce unlicensed staff to pick up/carry out the tasks that a credentialed SN is mandated per the CA Ed Code: This credential authorizes the holder to conduct immunization programs/and compliance follow ups, assess and evaluate the health and development status of pupils; interpret the health and development assessment to parents, teachers, administrators and other professionals directly concerned with the pupil; design and implement individual student health maintenance plans, incorporating plans directed by a physician; maintain communication with parents and all involved community practitioners and agencies to promote needed treatment and secure reports of findings pertinent to educational planning; interpret medical and nursing findings appropriate to the student's individualized education program and make recommendations to professional personnel directly involved; consult with, conduct in-service training for, and serve as a resource person to teachers and administrators; develop and implement health education curriculum; act as a participant in implementing a comprehensive health instruction curriculum for students; counsel and assist pupils and parents in health related and school adjustment services; and to teach health related subjects in collaboration with a classroom teacher???!!! |
1. Why are we not closing school sites and consolidating students instead of forcing unbalanced combo classes on schools? 2. How much budget are we cutting from central administrative roles v.s. frontline teaching staff. 3. Why can the PTA fund some positions and not others? |
Why are you not cutting more of central office people? If you feel that you can’t cut them, at least have their offices be in schools so that they can at least understand the needs of individual schools. |
Why hasn’t the district learned the difference between equality and equity? This is so important. |
Combination K & 1st Grade at Cleveland, I have concerns about how this will be implemented. Individual Attention: With one teacher managing two different grade levels, students might not receive the individualized attention they need. This could affect both the faster and slower learners, as they may not get the appropriate level of support or challenge. Curriculum Coverage: The teacher might struggle to cover the entire curriculum for both grades effectively, potentially leading to gaps in students' knowledge and understanding. Classroom Management: Managing a classroom with two different age groups can be challenging, which might result in disruptions and reduced quality of instruction time. Social and Emotional Development: Younger students might feel overwhelmed by the presence of older peers, while older students might not feel adequately challenged, affecting their engagement and motivation. Differentiated Instruction: The teacher might find it difficult to differentiate instruction to meet the diverse needs of students in both grades, potentially impacting the learning outcomes for all students. Absolutely, the early years of education are critical for laying the foundation for future learning and development. For kindergarten and 1st grade students, having individual classes tailored to their specific developmental stages can be incredibly beneficial. Thank You, Miguel Pineda father of a Kindergarten Student at Cleveland Elementary. |
Is the district considering consolidating a few of the schools with the lowest attendance? If not, why not? |
We have received concerns from multiple parents regarding reports that some SFUSD schools have combined 4th and 5th-grade students into the same classroom. Could you confirm whether this information is accurate? If so, could you provide SFUSD's response or reasoning behind this decision? |
Why is the district SLASHING the newcomer program at Mission Education Center? Why are you sending newcomers to other elementary schools when this school exists already where we are specialized in servicing spanish-speaking newcomers. Meanwhile teachers, principals and social workers at other schools are struggling to keep up with the needs of newcomers... Disproportionately our school deals with students with very limited schooling (4th /5th graders learning to read for the first time) and very high % of unhoused students. NEWCOMERS ARE SOME OF THE MOST VULNERABLE STUDENTS IN ALL OF SFUSD due to various factors. For a school district that talks so much about equity... wow slashing the newcomer elementary school sounds like a GREAT way to be student-focused and value social justice. Aren't those core values of SFUSD? Shame on the board's decision to make such significant cuts to Mission Education Center. 3 grades in one classroom, 0 principal, 0 social worker 0 nurse. All the people that make MEC a specialized program for newcomers... |
How are the current budget cuts going to affect paraeducators? Are we at risk? |
Why are you imposing restrictions on what individual PTAs use their funds for, when there is a budget crisis? What do you suggest happens with the current PTA funds? |
How will SFUSD’s budget challenges impact collaboration with community partners and how can community partners support SFUSD students, families, teachers, and administrators at this time? |
What concrete plans does SFUSD have to ensure foster and homeless students retain their current services, are not unfairly impacted, and receive equitable support throughout the transition? |
I don’t understand the policy to prevent use of PTA funds doesn’t seem to make sense. Can I ask what the reason might be? |
You state that the reason you are imposing PTA spending restrictions for “equity” as some schools do not have PTA funds. Why is the approach you have taken in the name of “equity” been to bring down the quality of those schools that have funds by causing an increase in class size, rather than “boosting” the schools that have not PTA? I don’t understand why, in order to be “equitable” the approach is to bring all schools down, rather than be to bring all schools up? |
Paper ceilings! I am a parent of two public school students. I've volunteered in the classroom, I've volunteered at community building events at the school (WPES), I've sat on the SSC, I'm a current board member on the Parent Club, I even got a job at the school as a noon monitor. I am well known by the students, staff and parents of WPES. I am willing to do more for our school and I have been invited to do more for the school by our administration. Unfortunately, I have hit a paper ceiling. I grew up in a foreign country and I do not have a bachelor's degree from an American university. I can't even be a substitute teacher (I've had two applications denied). How can we use the best tools in our tool box to solve difficult problems when we are limiting ourselves with paper barriers? |
How is the district holding those who caused this deficit accountable? Whether active or retired? It will not be teacher layoff! Cutting spendings/pay need to come higher administrative positions! |
What is the district doing to increase revenues from the city/county or state? Legislation? Ballot measures? |
So far this virtual town hall is very very disappointing. It is inappropriate and panic-inducing to continue to say we will "run out of cash" mid-2026. I am very frustrated that SFUSD is not taking ownership of the systemic problems that prevent the district from knowing what our numbers are. Ms Mele Lau-Smith has already made factually incorrect statements. We needed a commitment by Maria Su to address departmental ineptitude so we can have some faith at least that we will reach fiscal solvency. We also have NOT « lost our autonomy » |
Have you analyzed the impact these cuts will have on schools? |
My name is Miguel Pineda, and I am the parent of Sophie Pineda, a kindergarten student in Ms. Chow’s class at Cleveland Elementary. I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding the planned combination of kindergarten and 1st grade classes for the upcoming school year. The early years of education are crucial for establishing the foundation for future learning and development. For kindergarten and 1st grade students, having individual classes tailored to their specific developmental stages is immensely beneficial and sets the groundwork for their academic journey. Younger students might feel overwhelmed by the presence of older peers, while older students may not feel sufficiently challenged, affecting their engagement and motivation. With one teacher managing two different grade levels, students might not receive the individualized attention they need. This could impact both the faster and slower learners, as they may not receive the appropriate level of support or challenge. Additionally, the teacher may struggle to effectively cover the entire curriculum for both grades, potentially leading to gaps in students' knowledge and understanding. Kindergarten and 1st graders have distinct cognitive, social, and emotional needs. Individual classes enable teachers to provide instruction and activities that are developmentally appropriate for each grade. I believe it is essential to ensure that kindergarten and 1st grade students have individual classes to maximize their learning outcomes and overall school experience. Thank you for considering my concerns. I look forward to hearing from you. |
My daughter has 5 F’s as a junior! She shared at times there wasn’t a teacher in a classroom! She doesn’t understand the way her science teacher teaches? I cannot contact the school phone line due to full messages. The school has a recording back in August 2021! Principal at 2 high schools! Who is in charge to over sees that my child and many others are getting the right support to learn and graduate? This district’s hot mess is trickling down and affecting my child’s education! There is a need to make sure there are teachers to teach and support my child and many others on all grade level, Pk to 12! |
Why haven't you asked the Mayor to leave a portion of the Excess ERAF for SFUSD? |
If teachers that were previously CSR funded by site discretionary funds are removed from their positions, how will the district keep them at SFUSD? What is the hiring plan to stay competitive in a budget crisis this far reaching? |
What direction, assistance, and training is being offered to schools who are suddenly changing to a 4/5 combo and what curriculum will be used for the incoming 5th graders who did not have a 4th grade combination class? |
Why are schools being forced to retain instructional coaches when this new position, with vague and misunderstood expectations, is not a student-facing position? Instructional coaches are taking the place of CLASSROOM TEACHERS, SOCIAL WORKERS, LIBRARIANS, STUDENT ADVISORS, etc? These long held and critical positions should outweigh the need for instructional coaches. |
Our school is a magnate school for DHH and has an increased load of IEPs. We currently have 99 IEPs and we have lost our AP despite rules regulating the need for an administrator to be present for an IEP. How can a principal be expected to meet the regulatory requirements and also do his job as a principal? Also how does it makes sense that a PTA pay for an administratively required position like an AP but NOT certificate educators? If we do not pay for this position will we not be in violation of additional regulations regarding focal populations? |
We ask the district to consider allowing schools with dedicated PTA funding to retain their existing intervention teachers and continue providing essential academic support. |
How much is it costing us to expand the TK program and why did we choose to expand the TK program at a time when we are cutting gen-ed teachers for our core K-5 education? |
How does it make sense that you want to restrict PTA funds on certified teachers to address the teacher shortage, but at the same time are promoting retirement of current teachers? Don't those contradict? |
Are there cuts to classified employees working out of schools? Dr. Su only mentioned employees from Central office. |
Why are all sfusd executives and board focused on cutting and cutting funds, instead of tapping into partnerships through SF Foundation or other such organizations? I understand there are restrictions in legislation but can’t all brilliant brains in SFUSD find a way to inject funds from SF’s capitalist class that will not compromise the independence of our schools? |
Dr. Su did not answer the question about meeting our legal responsibilities for IEPs. Can you confirm that the current staffing plan will meet the legal requirements in each school? |
Why is the district weakening the Filiiino Language Program at Bessie Carmichael Filipino Education Program? |
The budget trend chart that was displayed showed a red line for the increasing costs over time. Is there a place where we can find more granular information on how the expenses have increased over time? |
How many assistant superintendents and directors will be cut? We have many more than districts of similar size. |
In the Virtual Town hall, Dr. Su stated that the reason PTAs will no longer be permitted to fund CSR teachers is because there is a nationwide teacher shortage and many classrooms do not have a qualified teacher. She stated that each classroom needs to have a qualified teacher; however she also said that hundreds of staff will be laid off. How can we have a teacher shortage while at the same time also laying off hundreds of staff, including qualified teachers? Won’t there be qualified teachers without a job or are you saying every single qualified teacher will be placed in a classroom and there won’t be any qualified teachers left for PTA funded CSR? Please clarify this very important discrepancy in your answer. |
Ninguno |
In the graph shown in the 3/13 virtual townhall titled 'Unrestricted General Fund Historical and Projected Trends", the expenditures look stable at around $600M from the four year period from 2018-2021 actuals, but over the four year period from 2022-2025, the expenditures rise to ~$825M. What are the main changes that have caused this $225M increase? |
How does the budget given to Mission education center benefit the newcomer students who need these resources that are being cut? Ex. Classroom teachers, social workers, nurses, etc. |
De cuanto es El presipiesto y cuales son los gastos ? |
What is SFUSD leadership's plan to stabilize our admin placements so there aren't massive shifts to school leaders as a result of layoffs? I am very pleased to see there are many admin layoffs but hope they are coming from central office and LEAD. LEAD provides very limited, if any, value to school staff and students. The district should better utilize ILT teams in the high schools to help with shared leadership roles and to help the district save money and have less bloat at the top. |
Why can't we use PTA funds on ARTIF? Our ESL students are not meeting literacy rates, and I would like the option to fund targeted interventions if the PTA can raise the funds. |
Can you reconsider the PTA money that can be used to hire staff? The PTA works very hard to raise money for the children and staff and it's very disheartening that we can't use that source of income to give our children what they need. |
Como podemos hacer afectados en el recorte de personal de las escuelas |
For accessibility purposes, please also offer at least one remote town hall. Unless these are in person repeats of the previous meeting on March 13? |
The supplemental hiring guidance set a 92% classroom teacher goal before any site level discretionary hires. Where did this 92% goal come from, 92% seems to be a odd number to strive for and is it even achievable given the staffing challenges at some schools? |
How will the elimination of DOE affect our district’s budget and title 1 funds? |
N/a |
Based on what data the new split grade classes work for all students with the budget cut? Students are the priority so does the educators. |
How can you possibly defend combo classes? There has to be a better solution. This will ruin our schools. |
How are you going to insure that my child has a teacher in every class? |
Was the Spanish language immersion pathway changed to 50/50 to cut costs from the budget? |
How can SFUSD maximize private donations through PTAs to maximize the amount of money coming in, while improving equity? |
Why is the district taking away the ability for parents/PTAs to fund certified teachers for their local schools? How does this better serve educational outcomes at the schools? How is SFUSD trying to attract more students who (a) leave the city or (2) go to private schools (e.g., allowing for multiple waitlist rounds to be completed before private school commitment dates are done)? |
We were a school on the closure list. Although we are not closing in 25-26, we continually wonder when, how, and if school closures will again be part of the stabilization plan. We would rather know more now and work to understand, collaborate, and prepare rather than it sneaking up on us. We hope there can be at least some acknowledgement of this reality of our community. ALSO, I am not a parent but the question "Which school does your child attend?" is required on this page, which is confusing. I suggest making it optional. Thank you! |
This page was last updated on March 26, 2025